Alexander Sanger to be biologically pro-life, one must be politically pro-choice
Home Bio Book The Sanger File Contact
Gay Marriage versus Reproductive Rights


Katha Pollitt recently penned ( see http://www.thenation.com/article/205049/theres-reason-gay-marriage-winning-while-abortion-rights-are-losing) another one of her astute analyses of the failure of reproductive rights to gain traction with the American public. She points out that gay rights are on a juggernaut to legality and respectability. She sets forth a number of reasons, a few of which deserve elaboration.

Sexual freedom – the Puritanical culture demands punishment for women (not men). So true. But Pollitt doesn’t say why. We’ll get to that.

Men don’t see reproductive rights (being for women) as being that important. Polls show that men and women support (and oppose) abortion rights almost equally and always have since polling began after Roe. She doesn’t mention the so-called men’s rights movements, which see abortion rights as being antithetical to a man’s right to become a parent only with his consent. Nor does she mention the uncomfortable truth that women oppose abortion rights almost equally with men.

Pollitt points out that low-income women suffer with abortion restrictions. So true. She doesn’t mention that many low-income women also support restrictions on abortion rights. So what is going on? Are they demented? Under their husband’s thumb?

Pollitt goes on to mention that marriage equality takes nothing away from anyone, whereas abortion and contraception “give power to women and take it from others: parents, employers, clergy and men.”

Ah, finally.

Abortion and contraception are about reproduction and who controls it. It is, in the view of many, a zero sum game – either men control when a child is to be conceived and born, or a woman does, though ideally it is a decision made jointly. So why do some women oppose having that control? I mean, it is their body, their health, and their life.

In a Gallup Poll from 2012 (the most recent I could find with this breakdown) those with a household income of over $75,000 called themselves pro-choice versus pro-life by 58-36, whereas with those with a household income of less that $30,000 the ratio swung the other way, 41-46.

One reason might be that low-income women, and men, see family formation and a male income as vital to survival and see restrictions on their own, and other women’s, reproductive rights as contributing to this. Male reasons include increasing paternity certainty that their children are theirs (DNA testing may be too new to have changed evolved behavior) –hence the Puritan culture that punishes women for infidelity. Restrictions on contraception and abortion also decrease the ability of husbands to stray with impunity – this is in a wife’s interests. Since contraceptive sauce for the goose is contraceptive sauce for the gander, women will give up this right for a, in their view, more vital goal. Restricting the reproductive rights and liberty of the “other woman” helps keep husbands home.

Women and men have reproductive strategies, sometimes individually sometimes in partnership. Contraception and abortion are inextricably intertwined with these. It is all about reproduction. There is a battle of the sexes, like it or not. It’s just that not all women see reproductive freedom as being in their reproductive interests, just as not all men see reproductive freedom for women as being antithetical to theirs.


» Link to this post
The Sangers - Artists and Rebels
From NY Times, Friday May 22, 2015, 
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/arts/design/bam-has-a-new-display-of-michael-graves-murals.html?ref=design&_r=0

An untitled painting by William Sanger. CreditAlexander Sanger 
THE SANGERS AS PAINTERS
Margaret Sanger and her family members are best known as birth-control pioneers. Yet three of them were also artists. Now their watercolors are on display at the Planned Parenthood of Northern New England’s gallery in Portland, Me.
The work includes pieces by Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, who took up painting after moving to Tucson in the late 1930s for her health, making mostly desert scenes. Her husband,William Sanger, was a painter and an architect, who began displaying his work in the 1910s; much of it featured stormy landscapes of Maine, where he was a frequent visitor.
Their grandson Alexander took up drawing and watercolors after his retirement as president and chief executive of New York City’s Planned Parenthood in 2000. He, too, paints on the Maine coast as well as in New York, where he is chairman of the International Planned Parenthood Council.
“I’m proud to be following in my grandparents’ footsteps in multiple ways,” Mr. Sanger said in a telephone interview. Particularly “haunting,” Mr. Sanger said, is his grandmother’s painting of a woman with three children walking away from an adobe church in the desert — which is something of a self-portrait, he said. Margaret Sanger had three children, and was indicted on charges of violating the Comstock law, which made it a crime to offer contraceptive information through the mail. “My grandmother’s holding a little girl’s arm and that’s my aunt, who died at age 5 of pneumonia,” he said. “The death was closely connected to circumstances — that my grandmother was in exile out of the country for a year. This is the one painting that she kept till the end of her life.”
The show, “The Sangers — Artists and Rebels,” which runs through May 29, coincides with the 50th anniversary of Planned Parenthood of Northern New England. Information: 207-232-4123. ROBIN POGREBIN
» Link to this post
Speech at PPNNE, Portland,Maine - April 29, 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jf7oaCF386Y&feature=em-upload_owner

» Link to this post


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



Alexander Sanger
Alexander C. Sanger, the grandson of Margaret Sanger, who founded the birth control movement over eighty years ago, is currently Chair of the International Planned Parenthood Council.
Mr. Sanger previously served as the President of Planned Parenthood of New York City (PPNYC) and its international arm, The Margaret Sanger Center International (MSCI) for ten years from 1991 - 2000.

Mr. Sanger speaks around the country and the world and has served as a Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations Population Fund.

Beyond Choice
Beyond Choice
The new book by Alexander Sanger published by PublicAffairs


Purchase from Amazon.com

Click here for full book information

With reproductive freedom in jeopardy, Alexander Sanger, grandson of renowned family planning advocate Margaret Sanger and a longtime leader in the reproductive rights movement, has taken an urgent, fresh look at the pro-choice position—and even the pro-life position—and finds them necessary, but insufficient. In Beyond Choice he offers the first major re-thinking of these positions in thirty years.

“Well researched and readable, Beyond Choice should be required reading for both pro-choice and pro-life supporters.”
—Governor Christine Todd Whitman

»

» Much more on Beyond Choice, including an excerpt, discussion guides, reviews
The Sanger List
Sign up to receive updates and news from Alexander Sanger
External Links
» Eugenics, Race, and Margaret sanger Revisited: Reproductive Freedom for All?
Hypatia, Indiana University Press
Recent Press
» Abortion in the Spotlight [PDF]
Tina Morlock, Oklahoma City Pioneer

» Advocate: Abortion does involve morality
Paul Swiech, The Pantagraph

» Planned Parenthood founder: Republican Party is pro-choice
Elaine Hopkins, The Journal Star

» Women's Studies seminar covers controversial topic
Jamie Smith, The Daily Vidette

» Luncheon promotes teen responsibility
Dahlia Weinstein, Rocky Mountain News
Blog Archives
» January 2004
» February 2004
» March 2004
» April 2004
» May 2004
» July 2004
» September 2004
» October 2004
» November 2004
» December 2004
» February 2005
» March 2005
» April 2005
» June 2005
» July 2005
» September 2005
» October 2005
» November 2005
» December 2005
» January 2006
» February 2006
» March 2006
» April 2006
» June 2006
» November 2006
» February 2007
» July 2007
» September 2007
» November 2007
» January 2008
» February 2008
» March 2008
» May 2008
» September 2008
» October 2008
» December 2008
» June 2009
» July 2009
» September 2009
» October 2009
» November 2009
» January 2010
» February 2010
» April 2010
» May 2010
» October 2010
» November 2010
» December 2010
» January 2011
» February 2011
» May 2011
» July 2011
» October 2011
» November 2011
» December 2011
» February 2012
» April 2012
» June 2012
» September 2012
» October 2012
» January 2013
» February 2013
» April 2013
» May 2013
» June 2013
» July 2013
» November 2013
» January 2014
» March 2014
» May 2014
» July 2014
» December 2014
» March 2015
» April 2015
» May 2015
» June 2015
» July 2015
» September 2015
» October 2015
» December 2015
» January 2016
» February 2016
» April 2016
» May 2016
» June 2016
» August 2016
» October 2016
» November 2016
» December 2016
» January 2017
» February 2017
» March 2017


 Subscribe in a reader
External Links
» International Planned Parenthood Federation/Western Hemisphere Region

» UN Goodwill Ambassadors

» The Margaret Sanger Papers Project, NYU History Dept.

» When Sex Counts: Making Babies and Making Law, by Sherry Colb