January 17, 2014
A Resolution for 2014: Eliminating Health Care Inequality
A Resolution for 2014: Eliminating Health Care Inequality
As we ease into 2014, many of us are continuing to make good on New Year's resolutions to better ourselves and appreciate the good in our lives in an increasingly unpredictable world.
I have the fortune to experience this hope and inspiration each time I walk through the doors of the International Planned Parenthood/Western Hemisphere Region offices. From lawyers to doctors to human rights advocates, my colleagues are remarkable. They work hard and long hours, often spending weeks away from their families to lend their expertise and passion to ensuring the most rural and marginalized communities in Latin America and the Caribbean -- one of the most unequal regions in the world
-- have a voice and a choice.
Recently, I had the opportunity to chat with Jessie Clyde, our Youth Program Officer, about her work. Given the recent news about the decline of the Argentinian economy and the murder of Miss Venezuela, protecting the health and rights of the region's 106 million youth is one of the most crucial and impactful investments we can make. I hope you enjoy her guest post on how inequality impacts sexual and reproductive health:
Compared to other regions of the world, Latin America seems to be doing well at first glance. Health indicators show progress: maternal and child mortality numbers have dropped, contraceptive use is up and abortion was even legalized in Mexico City in 2011. But as a public health professional in the region with a focus on the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents, I'm not so quick to celebrate these victories: My fieldwork has taught me that national averages often tell a very different story than the reality found on the ground.
All it takes is a quick detour from the urban capitals and glossy tourist havens to see the large number of people in the region who still desperately need quality health services. On a recent trip to Venezuela, it took only a few minutes to leave the sparkling city behind and find ourselves in the slums of the surrounding hills. On these steep streets, I encountered a pregnant 15 year-old girl who didn't have the information or access to services to prevent unintended pregnancies. A short boat ride away from the famous turquoise waters of the Belize cayes, young people speak to me about high levels of violence, HIV and adolescent pregnancies. And in Argentina, I have spoken with undocumented immigrants in public hospitals who struggle to get their basic health care needs met because of discrimination.
A recent study by the Guttmacher Institute
backs up my observation that while the region as a whole is doing well, there are still pockets of extreme poverty that leave women unable to access basic services. The report begins by telling us the good news. Approximately seven out of 10 married Mexican women of childbearing age currently use a contraceptive method (a level similar to the United States), family size has declined from about six children in the 1970s to just over two, and maternal mortality has fallen significantly.
However, despite these impressive achievements, large disparities by population subgroups remain. The services, supplies and human resources that allow women in wealthier urban areas to plan their families are not always available to all. Poorer states such as Chiapas, Guerrero and Oaxaca still have large populations living in homes with no indoor plumbing or electricity, let alone access to sexual and reproductive health care. Not surprisingly, the indicators in those regions aren't quite as rosy. For example, abortions in Mexico City are safe and accordingly, just 0.5 percent of these procedures were associated with mild complications in 2009. However, of the abortions obtained by poor rural women, 45 percent led to complications. This figure is even more striking when you consider the fact thatnearly half of Mexico's population lives in poverty.
The first step in closing these gaps is to have the data that proves they exist. The Guttmacher study is a great step forward, but comparable data for other countries in the region is largely unavailable, leaving health professionals without the quantitative data needed to shift policies and budgets.
Latin America is a diverse region that spans the peaks of the Andes to the tributaries of the Amazon to the Panama Canal. That is a diversity that we should continue to celebrate. However, when it comes to access to health care and sexual and reproductive health indicators, we want to see fewer differences across those mountains, rivers and canals.
January 07, 2014
Ken Edelin died last week at age 74. In addition to his distinguished career as a physician, Ken served as Chair of the Board of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America for three years, 1989-1992. I had the honor of sharing a podium with him in San Francisco when we were both honored by the local Planned Parenthood affiliate. He spoke passionately about his trials and tribulations serving women who had no other choices or access. He was an example for physicians everywhere in his dedication and willingness to put his patients first. Women have access to safer abortion procedures now because of his example and trial. I am glad to have know him.
January 02, 2014
Women's Rights in 2013--- The Good, The Bad and the Ugly
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Women's Rights in 2013
As we reflect on the events of 2013, I can't help but think of the Clint Eastwood classic The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
When it came to women's rights, there was indeed ugliness: more and more states tried to restrict women's access to basic reproductive health care, and in El Salvador, Glenda Cruz was sentenced to 10 years
in prison for miscarrying.
Despite these setbacks, there is reason for hope. Here's my wrap-up of the top five wins for sexual and reproductive rights in 2013:
1. The rape and murder of a 23 year-old woman in New Delhi set off widespread protests throughout India. In September, an Indian court sentenced the four perpetrators to death, stating that the crime "shocked the collective conscience of India."
2. In the Dominican Republic, the Catholic Church filed a legal complaint against our local partner Profamilia, claiming that its ad campaign on sexual rights violated the Constitution
. In May, the Fifth Civil and Commercial Chamber of the National District rejected the Church's complaint as a violation of freedom of expression, adding that campaigns like Profamilia's help to promote comprehensive sexuality education and responsible parenthood. The public and media support for Profamilia during and after the case was massive, but it was not an easy battle.
3. As more states sought measures to tighten abortion laws, some fought to make it more accessible.
In June, Texas senator Wendy Davis rose to national prominence during a 13-hour filibuster protesting SB5, a bill that would further restrict abortion access in Texas. While the legislation ultimately passed, a vigorous protest from Davis -- and supporters throughout the country -- was heard loud and clear. In California, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a measure
into law that allows nurse practitioners, certified nurse-midwives and physicians' assistants who complete specified training to perform abortions.
4. On August 15, the first session of the Regional Conference on Population and Development concluded as representatives of 38 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean adopted an historic agreement: the Montevideo Consensus on Population and Development
. At this meeting to assess progress towards implementing the Cairo Programme of Action, governments recognized the important connections between sexual and reproductive health and rights and the global development agenda. More than 250 members of civil society -- including IPPF/WHR and our Member Associations -- helped forge this victory. The Consensus is the first UN agreement
to include a definition of sexual rights, "which embrace the right to a safe and full sex life, as well as the right to take free, informed, voluntary and responsible decisions on their sexuality, sexual orientation and gender identity, without coercion, discrimination or violence." With governments poised to adopt a new global development framework, this agreement will help ensure that sexual rights and reproductive rights remain at the center of efforts to reduce poverty and improve the well-being of individuals, communities and nations.
5. Perhaps the greatest "good" is the fact that despite fierce opposition, millions of women, men and young people throughout the world continue to fight to ensure that all people have access to quality healthcare and protection of their human rights.
In 2012, we provided nearly 33 million services
throughout the Americas and Caribbean with more than 75% of those services reaching poor and vulnerable populations. In a region where an estimated 95% of abortions take place in unsafe circumstances, the importance of access to contraception and accurate health information cannot be underestimated.
November 22, 2013
Article on talk at the Carey Center
fears he may soon be facing battles too similar to the ones his grandmother fought.
As with the law recently passed in Texas that restricts women's access to reproductive health services, Sanger foresees the kind of society that birth control activist Margaret Sanger confronted in the decades before the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that women have a legal right to abortion.
"There is going to be a growing underground of illegal and unsafe family planning and abortion services. This is my fear," Sanger said.
The abortion rights movement has been on hold for decades, going back to the 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, Sanger said. Recent polls show that more than half of Americans believe abortion should be legal under certain circumstances. About a quarter believe it should be legal without restriction, and a fifth believe it should never be legal.
"This is identical to 1975," Sanger said. "We have not moved the needle one iota after 40 years of pretty heated — sometimes violent — opposition to abortion rights and our arguments that Roe was a good decision."
One change that abortion rights advocates need to make, Sanger said, is to replace the decades-old rallying cry of "choice." While the movement has long promoted a woman's "right to choose" an abortion — and advocates are called "pro-choice" — the term has become loaded with unintended political meaning, Sanger said. In addition, the concept can lack necessary weight, as when it's used by, say, a mobile phone company trying to sell its wireless network.
"My problem with 'choice' is that it hasn't worked for the last 40 years." Sanger said.
He suggested a focus on women's autonomy and human reproduction instead.
Women who have had abortions must go public with their private stories, Sanger said. Gay people gained acceptance by coming out of the closet and telling their families, friends and colleagues about their sexuality. Acceptance of abortion will also increase, Sanger said, if more Americans understand that they likely know someone who has had the procedure.
Still, Sanger conceded, women's abortion stories are unique and complicated — not the sort of thing that's easy to wrap into a slogan.
"In each case the common denominator — in my reading and my conversations with women around the world — is they're not ready to be mothers at this particular time," Sanger said. "They want to be mothers, they want to care for the children they already have. And they want to time childbearing to give their children the best chance in the world."
Male partners need to stand by the courageous women who tell these stories, he said.
"Here I am a man telling women what they will be saying and not saying," he said. "I'm acutely sensitive to that."
His grandmother is his inspiration to keep pushing for reproductive rights, Sanger said. Margaret Sanger opened the country's first birth control clinic, in Brooklyn, and established the organizations that would become Planned Parenthood. Alexander Sanger recalled her visits from her home in Arizona to his childhood home in Westchester County.
"She was always on the move. She was no sooner arriving at our house than she'd be getting on the train to another meeting or another speech," he said. "She was a very powerful and extraordinary woman."
How to attend
What: Alexander Sanger will speak at the Carey Institute for Global Good
When: 7 p.m. Saturday. Doors open at 6 p.m.
Where: The Carey Institute, 63 Huyck Road, Rensselaerville, on the campus previously occupied by Rensselaerville Institute.
November 18, 2013
Speech at the Carey Center this weekend
I am speaking this Saturday at the Carey Center for Global Good.
When: Sat, Nov 23, 2013 | 7:00 PM
Where: Carey Center for Global Good, 63 Huyck Road, Rensselaerville, New York
November 12, 2013
Women's Leadership in Theaters
Republicans, Women and the 2013 Elections
This is the link to the Huffington Post version of the blog entry
November 08, 2013
Did the Republicans
Lose Women in the 2013 Elections
Virginia and New Jersey have spoken - the former electing a
pro-choice governor and the latter an anti. Did Choice matter? Did Women
The Choice Gap in
Abortion was considered the third most important issue by
Virginia voters, with the economy and health care coverage outweighing it.
The Virginia electorate's views on abortion rights almost exactly
mirror the national opinion.
The 2012 national election and 2013 Virginia election exit poll
breakdown are as follows, when the voters were asked if abortion should be:
Legal in all cases
Legal in most cases
Illegal in most cases
Illegal in all cases
Voters nationally and in Virginia generally vote for the
candidate that supports their view, with the exception of the "Legal in
most cases" group, which tends to have a greater percentage voting for the
anti-choice candidate than the "Illegal in most cases" group has
voting for the pro-choice candidate.
Legal in most cases
Illegal in most cases
In other words there is a 20-percentage point difference in
voting patterns in these categories. The pro-choice candidates, Obama and
McAuliffe, got 58% and 59% respectively of the ‘
legal in most cases’
voter, while Romney and Cuccinelli got 76% and 80% of the ‘
in most cases’
This pattern is similar to the abortion gap in 2012. Romney got
29% of the vote of people who thought abortion should be legal, whereas Obama
got only 21% of the vote of people who thought abortion should be illegal.
This is a pattern that has been seen repeatedly in national and
state elections. The mostly pro-choice voter votes other issues more than choice,
whereas the mostly anti-choice voter does not. That said, the raw numbers still
favor by a slight margin the pro-choice candidate, since the pool of
voters in the ‘
legal in most cases’
camp is larger by 7-10 percentage
points than the ‘
illegal in most cases’
The Gender Gap in
There was the usual gender gap in Virginia, with men supporting
Cuccinelli 48 to 45 and women supporting McAuliffe 51 to 42 for a 12-point gap,
virtually identical to the 2012 Virginia gender gap for Obama of 13 points. The
national gap gender for Obama in 2012 was 18 points, hence Virginia trails the
54% of white women voted for Cuccinelli, as did 51% of married women.
Women are not monolithic, to say the least, in their support of pro-choice
candidates or Democrats.
The Marriage Gap in
A greater voting gap was the married-unmarried gap,
In 2012, marrieds went for Romney 56-42. Unmarrieds went for
Obama 62-35, for a 41-point marriage gap.
In Virginia in 2013, marrieds went for Cuccinelli 50-43 and
Unmarrieds for McAuliffe 62-29, for a 40-point marriage gap, virtually
identical to the national marriage gap.
In New Jersey, every group went for the popular anti-choice,
anti-family planning incumbent, with 63% of men and 57% of women voting for
Christie. Abortion rights was not a major issue in the campaign, not
registering on the exit polls.
The messages from these campaigns include the non-monolithic
character of women voters and choice voters. Issues other than choice, and even
family planning, are not the primary determinants of many women voters. The
gender gap is real, but the marriage, income and race gaps are greater. Politicians
have yet to make the compelling case that reproductive freedom is essential for
women, and men, and that they should vote accordingly. The connections to
issues perceived as of greater importance, like the economy, taxes and health
care coverage, need to be made. Healthy families with planned and spaced
children of one’
s choosing lead to increased women’
s participation in
the economy, more productivity, and less health care expenditures and taxes.
This is a message equally compelling to marrieds as unmarrieds, but so far only
the latter group have gotten the message and vote accordingly, as they want to
keep their life options open.
Alexander C. Sanger
Mr. Sanger previously served as the President of Planned Parenthood of New York City (PPNYC) and its international arm, The Margaret Sanger Center International (MSCI) for ten years from 1991 - 2000.
, the grandson of Margaret Sanger, who founded the birth control movement over eighty years ago, is currently Chair of the International Planned Parenthood Council.
Mr. Sanger speaks around the country and the world and has served as a Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations Population Fund.
With reproductive freedom in jeopardy, Alexander Sanger, grandson of renowned family planning advocate Margaret Sanger and a longtime leader in the reproductive rights movement, has taken an urgent, fresh look at the pro-choice position—and even the pro-life position—and finds them necessary, but insufficient. In Beyond Choice he offers the first major re-thinking of these positions in thirty years.
“Well researched and readable, Beyond Choice should be required reading for both pro-choice and pro-life supporters.”
—Governor Christine Todd Whitman
» Much more on Beyond Choice, including an excerpt, discussion guides, reviews
Sign up to receive updates and news from Alexander Sanger
» Eugenics, Race, and Margaret sanger
Revisited: Reproductive Freedom for All?
Hypatia, Indiana University Press
» Abortion in the Spotlight [PDF]
Tina Morlock, Oklahoma City Pioneer
» Advocate: Abortion does involve morality
Paul Swiech, The Pantagraph
» Planned Parenthood founder: Republican Party is pro-choice
Elaine Hopkins, The Journal Star
» Women's Studies seminar covers controversial topic
Jamie Smith, The Daily Vidette
» Luncheon promotes teen responsibility
Dahlia Weinstein, Rocky Mountain News
» January 2004
» February 2004
» March 2004
» April 2004
» May 2004
» July 2004
» September 2004
» October 2004
» November 2004
» December 2004
» February 2005
» March 2005
» April 2005
» June 2005
» July 2005
» September 2005
» October 2005
» November 2005
» December 2005
» January 2006
» February 2006
» March 2006
» April 2006
» June 2006
» November 2006
» February 2007
» July 2007
» September 2007
» November 2007
» January 2008
» February 2008
» March 2008
» May 2008
» September 2008
» October 2008
» December 2008
» June 2009
» July 2009
» September 2009
» October 2009
» November 2009
» January 2010
» February 2010
» April 2010
» May 2010
» October 2010
» November 2010
» December 2010
» January 2011
» February 2011
» May 2011
» July 2011
» October 2011
» November 2011
» December 2011
» February 2012
» April 2012
» June 2012
» September 2012
» October 2012
» January 2013
» February 2013
» April 2013
» May 2013
» June 2013
» July 2013
» November 2013
» January 2014
Subscribe in a reader
» International Planned Parenthood Federation/Western Hemisphere Region
» UN Goodwill Ambassadors
» The Margaret Sanger Papers Project, NYU History Dept.
» When Sex Counts: Making Babies and
Making Law, by Sherry Colb